Thanks to all of you, lecturers and participants alike, for attending
the first MARGINS Theoretical and Experimental Institute dealing with
the "Rheology and deformation of the lithosphere". In our opinion, it
was very successful. Rather than rest on our collective laurels, the convenors
would like constructive comment concerning the short course material and
venue in order help improve subsequent theoretical institutes. Your help
in this evaluation process is needed. Thus, when you get a chance, please
answer the questions below from excellent(1) to poor(5). This entire process
should not take very long but your input is very important to us. Again,
thanks for your help with the evaluation forms and thank you very much
for your participation in the short course.
| A) SHORT COURSE MATERIAL/PRESENTATIONS |
Evaluation
|
|
1. Were the presentations effective?
|
|
| 2. Was the overall program sufficiently
balanced? |
|
3. Was the short course program and
lecture material presented in a logical manner?
|
|
| 4. Were the short course handouts (pdf
files) effective? |
|
| 5. Did the presented material enhance
your knowledge in areas that were not your specialty? |
|
| 6. Was the length of time for each lecture
adequate? |
|
| 7. Was the length of time for discussion
adequate? |
|
| 8. Was the total length of time for the
short course appropriate? |
|
| 9. Were the total number of presentations
appropriate? |
|
|
10. Were there any omissions or oversights in the short course?
Comments:
|
|
11. Please recommend changes to the short course that would have
enhanced its effectiveness. Response:
|
