Plate Tectonics
Early Ideas About Continental Drift
Several scientists and thinkers
have concluded that the continents were not always in their current locations:
-
Sir Francis Bacon (1620) - Noted similarity of the shapes of shorelines
of eastern South America and western Africa. Did not propose that the continents
were once joined.
-
Antonio Pellegrini (1858) - Suggested that continents were all linked
together during the Pennsylvanian and later spilt apart, based on the similarities
between plant fossils found in Pennsylvanian-aged coal beds of North America
and Europe. Separation of continents attributed to biblical deluge.
-
Edward Suess (late 1800s) - Noted similarities between Paleozoic
plant fossils of India, Australia, Africa, S. America and Antarctica and
evidence for glaciation on these landmasses. Proposed these landmasses
were all once joined together in a supercontinent (Gondwanaland
or Gondwana) by land bridges. Land bridges later sank beneath the
ocean.
-
Frank Taylor (1910) - Explained formation of mountain ranges as
the result of the lateral movement of continents. Envisioned present-day
continents as part of larger landmasses that were in polar locations. Huge
tidal forces resulting from the Earth's capture of the moon caused the
Earth's rotation to slow and broke apart the polar continents. Continents
resulted from polar landmass fragments migrating toward the equator. Proposed
that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (discovered by H.M.S. Challenger expeditions
1872-1876) marked the site along which an ancient continent broke apart
to form the modern Atlantic Ocean.
Continental Drift
Alfred Wegener's Hypothesis (published in 1915)
Wegener proposed that the
continents were once joined in one supercontinent (Pangaea), which began
breaking up 200 million years ago. Produced maps showing movement of continents
to their current locations. The hypothesis was refined by Alexander du
Toit (1937) who proposed that Pangaea initially split into two large land
masses: Gondwanaland in the Southern Hemisphere and Laurasia (N. America,
Greenland, Europe, and most of Asia) in the Northern Hemisphere, based
on similar ages for glacial deposits on Gondwana landmasses and coal deposits
on Laurasia landmasses.
Response to Continental Drift Hypothesis
All evidence listed above
was attacked by different geologists as being inconclusive. Major evidence
of continental drift were in the Southern Hemisphere. Most geologists lived
in the Northern Hemisphere. Review of hypothesis was conducted in an international
symposium held by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in 1928.
Idea was largely abandoned by 1929 because of the lack of a reasonable
driving mechanism for continental motion (Wegener believed that continents
plowed their way through oceanic crust under tidal energy).
Evidence for Continental Drift
-
Fit of Continents - Continental slopes of S. America and Africa
at 2,000 meters depth match in shape like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
-
Rock and Structural Similarities - Mountain chains that end abruptly
at the edge of a continent can be traced to continue on another continent
on the other side of an ocean. Rock types and ages correlate across continents,
as well as faults.
-
Paleoclimates - Rock deposits restricted to certain climates
(glacial till, coal, evaporites) have been found in areas having very
-
different climates today. Glacial deposits of Paleozoic age covered sections
of S. America, Africa, India, Antarctica, and Australia (Gondwanaland).
Other rock deposits (coal and evaporites) show matches across the Northern
Hemisphere continents (Laurasia) and indicate a tropical climate (location
near equator).
-
Fossil Evidence - Most compelling of the older evidence for continental
drift. Uniform plant fossils of distinct type (Glossopteris floral) have
been found in equivalent-aged rock on the Gondwanaland continents only.
Seeds were too large to have been wind-carried across oceans and present-day
climates are too varied. Restricted animal fossils: Mesosaurus (a freshwater
reptile) and 2 land-dwelling reptiles, also point to linkages of S. America,
Africa, and Antarctica.
Paleomagnetism and Polar Wandering
New techniques developed
in the 1950s caused a resurgence of interest in continental drift:
-
Paleomagnetism (Natural Remnant Magnetism) - Iron-bearing rocks
contain minerals like magnetite which act as fossil compasses. The Earth's
magnetic field orientation is "frozen in" these iron-bearing minerals when
igneous rocks are cooled below the Curie Point (about 580 degrees
C for magnetite). Later movement of the rock can be determined by the orientation
of the current magnetic field compared to the rock's paleomagnetism. The
declination
(angle away from true north) of the paleomagnetism gives the longitude
that the rock formed at, and the inclination (tilt from horizontal)
gives the latitude.
-
Polar Wandering - Study of paleomagnetism of rocks showed that either
(1) the magnetic poles have moved dramatically in the Earth's past, or
(2) that the continents have changed position relative to stationary magnetic
poles, or (3) that both continents and magnetic poles have moved. The only
way to reconcile the apparent paleomagnetic inconsistency and produce only
one N and S pole (rather than different poles for each continent) is explanation
(2). When the continents are fitted together, the paleomagnetic data points
to one magnetic pole each in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.
Sea-Floor Exploration
Mapping of Ocean Floor
Detailed mapping of the ocean
floors began in the 1950s using echo-sounding techniques. Allowed topography
of the
ocean floor to be determined. Studies revealed:
-
Mid-ocean ridge and rift valley with associated volcanism.
-
Deep ocean trenches with associated earthquake activity.
-
Thinness of oceanic crust compared to continental crust.
-
Lack of compressive deformation in oceanic crust.
-
All dredged sediment samples were relatively young in age.
-
Sediment thickness increases away from the oceanic ridge.
-
Presence of guyots (submerged, flat-topped volcanoes) extending away from
oceanic ridges.
Magnetic Anomalies (Reversals)
Magnetic mapping of the ocean
floors began in the early 1960s and is now complete for most of the ocean
floor. Discovered that parallel, symmetric stripes of normal and reversed
polarity rocks lie on either side of the oceanic ridges. Reversed polarity
rocks can also be found on the continents, which show that reversals of
the Earth's magnetic field (N becomes S and vice versa) have occurred many
times in the geologic past. Reversals may be caused by sunspot activity
at times of decreased magnetic field intensity. Historical pattern of the
Earth's magnetism has been determined for the past several million years
by combining the techniques of radiocarbon dating with paleomagnetism.
Ocean floor magnetic surveys show youngest crust is located adjacent to
the spreading ridges and that the age of the crust increases with distance
away from the ridge.
Sea-Floor Spreading
Theory that the ocean floors are spreading apart and moving away from
the oceanic ridges (propelled by thermal convection cells in the
mantle) and that ocean crust is created at oceanic ridges and destroyed
by subduction in deep ocean trenches. Proposed by Harry Hess in 1962 to
explain the topographic features of the ocean floor and supported or explained
by:
-
Paleomagnetism - Theory supported when Vine and Matthews (1963) explained
the pattern of alternating stripes of normal and reversed polarity rocks
on either side of the oceanic ridges using sea-floor spreading. Also explains
increasing age of the oceanic crust with increasing distance from the ridge.
Rates of sea-floor spreading varies from almost 2 cm/yr in the North Atlantic
to more than 18 cm/yr in some sections of the Pacific oceanic ridge. Sea
floor spreading provides a driving force for continental movement (continents
ride on plates which are driven by the Earth's internal energy).
-
Deep-Sea Drilling Project - Sea Floor Spreading has been confirmed by the
Deep-Sea Drilling Project (DSDP began in 1968) which has obtained many
sediment cores from the ocean floor has shown that the ocean basins are
very young features. This indicates that ocean crust is continually being
created at the oceanic ridges, and old ocean crust is destroyed by subduction.
Evidence includes:
-
No rocks older than 180 million years have been found.
-
Ocean sediments are absent at the ridge and get progressively thicker away
from the ridge.
-
Ocean sediments get progressively older away from the ridge.
-
Rate of sea-floor spreading calculated from fossils is identical to that
estimated from paleomagnetic data.
Plate Tectonics
Combines the concepts of
continental drift and sea-floor spreading together into a unified theory
of the Earth's dynamics. Explains many apparently unrelated geologic events
and features. Elements of theory are:
-
World System of Plates - The Earth's lithosphere is broken up into 6-7
major plates and about 14 minor ones. Oceanic plates are 50-100 km thick.
Continental plates are 100-250 km thick. Tectonic plates can include both
continental and oceanic areas. Six (or 7) major plates are:
1. Indian-Australian
4. Antarctic
2. Pacific
5. African
3. American (N. and S)
6. Eurasian
-
Plate Boundaries - Tectonic plates interact in various ways as they move
across the asthenosphere, producing volcanoes, earthquakes and mountain
systems. Types of boundaries are:
-
Divergent - Plates move away from one another, creating a tensional
environment. Characterized by shallow-focus earthquakes and volcanism.
Release of pressure causes partial melting of mantle peridotite and produces
basaltic magma. Magma rises to surface and forms new oceanic crust. Occur
in oceanic crust (oceanic ridges) and in continental crust (rift valleys).
Continental rift valleys may eventually flood to form a new ocean basin.
-
Convergent - Plates move toward one another, creating a compressional
environment. Characterized by deformation, volcanism, metamorphism, mountain
building, seismicity, and important mineral deposits. Three possible kinds
of convergent boundaries:
-
Oceanic-Oceanic Boundary - One plate is subducted, initiating andesitic
ocean floor volcanism on the other. Can eventually form an island arc volcanic
island chain with an adjacent deep ocean trench. Characterized by a progression
from shallow to deep focus earthquakes from the trench toward the island
arc (Benioff zone). May also form a back-arc basin if subduction rate is
faster than forward motion of overriding plate.
-
Oceanic-Continental Boundary - Oceanic plate is dense and subducts
under the Lighter continental plate. Produces deep ocean trench at the
edge of the continent. About half the oceanic sediment descends with the
subducting plate; the other half is piled up against the continent. Subducting
plate and sediments partially melt, producing andesitic or granitic magma.
Produces volcanic mountain chains on continents called volcanic arcs
and batholiths. Part of the oceanic plate can be broken off and thrust
up onto the continent during subduction (obduction). Obduction can
expose very deep rocks (oceanic crust, sea floor sediment, and mantle material)
at the surface. Characterized by shallow to intermediate focus earthquakes
with rare deep focus earthquakes.
-
Continental-Continental Boundary - Continental crust cannot subduct,
so continental rocks are piled up, folded, and fractured into very high
complex mountain systems. Characterized by shallow-focus earthquakes, rare
intermediate-focus earthquakes. and practically no volcanism.
-
Transform - Plates move laterally past one another. Largely shear
stress with lithosphere being neither created nor destroyed. Characterized
by faults that parallel the direction of plate movement, shallow-focus
earthquakes, intensely shattered rock, and no volcanic activity. Shearing
motion can produce both compressional stress and tensional stress where
a fault bends. Transform faults occur on land, connect segments of the
oceanic ridge, and provide the mechanism by which crust can be carried
to subduction zones.
Plate Movement and Motion
Plates move in different
directions, change direction over time, and move at different rates. The
Pacific and Cocos plates are the fastest moving and the Arabian and southern
African plates are slowest. The rates and directions of lithospheric plate
movement can be calculated in several ways:
-
Date Ocean Sediments - Determine age of sediments at a point and
divide by distance from ridge. Gives average rate of movement, but no direction.
Least accurate method.
-
Magnetic Reversals - Date magnetic reversals and divide by distances
from ridge. Gives both average rate of movement and relative motion during
the past. Wider stripes indicate faster plate motion.
-
Satellite Laser Ranging Techniques - Laser beams from a station
on one plate are bounced off a satellite and returned to a station on another
plate. With divergent plate movement, the laser beam takes more time to
reach the receiving station. Time difference is used to calculate the rate
of movement and relative motion of the plates.
-
Quasar Ranging Technique - Difference in arrival times of signal
from a quasar to receiving stations on different plates. Calculated rates
and relative directions of plate motion correlate well with those determined
from magnetic reversals.
-
Hot Spots - Hot spots provide a fixed reference point that allows
the absolute (rather than relative) direction of motion to be determined.
Plate Tectonics Driving Mechanism
The forces that drive the
motion of plates are assumed to be associated with the Earth's internal
heat and involve
flow of material in the asthenosphere. Various mechanisms have been
proposed:
-
Convection Cells - Thought to be primary driving force for plate
motion. Unequal heat distribution in the mantle may produce
convection cells below the lithosphere. Hot material rises (correlates
to spreading center), spreads laterally, cools and sinks deeper into the
mantle to be reheated. Two convection cell models:
-
Shallow Convection Cell Model - Convection cells are restricted
to the asthenosphere. Difficult to explain the source of heat for convection
and the reason convection is restricted to the asthenosphere.
-
Deep Convection Cell Model - Entire mantle is involved in convection.
Outer mantle is source of heat. Problem explaining how convection involved
both the asthenosphere and lower mantle and how heat is transferred from
the outer core to the mantle.
-
Mantle Plumes (not in book) - Hot spots, or plumes, of hot rising
mantle material are known to exist around the world. Hot spots occur primarily
at spreading centers (black smokers), although a few occur in the
centers of oceanic plates and result in the formation of volcanic island
chains. Hot plume upwarps overlying lithosphere which cracks and moves
laterally away from the plume. Downward flow of the mantle must occur somewhere
to balance the upward flow in the plumes.
-
Push-Pull Model - Lithospheric plates are pushed apart at hot spreading
centers. Cold lithospheric plates are dense and tend to sink into the mantle,
pulling the rest of the plate with it. Each part of the model can operate
independently and are gravity driven.
-
Expanding Earth (not in book) - Model holds that the Earth has expanded
through its history, so that overall new crust is being created at spreading
centers. Has few supporters. Would require a 50% increase in the volume
of the Earth over the last 200 million years.
