Plate Tectonics

Early Ideas About Continental Drift

        Several scientists and thinkers have concluded that the continents were not always in their current locations:

Continental Drift

Alfred Wegener's Hypothesis (published in 1915)

        Wegener proposed that the continents were once joined in one supercontinent (Pangaea), which began breaking up 200 million years ago. Produced maps showing movement of continents to their current locations. The hypothesis was refined by Alexander du Toit (1937) who proposed that Pangaea initially split into two large land masses: Gondwanaland in the Southern Hemisphere and Laurasia (N. America, Greenland, Europe, and most of Asia) in the Northern Hemisphere, based on similar ages for glacial deposits on Gondwana landmasses and coal deposits on Laurasia landmasses.

Response to Continental Drift Hypothesis

        All evidence listed above was attacked by different geologists as being inconclusive. Major evidence of continental drift were in the Southern Hemisphere. Most geologists lived in the Northern Hemisphere. Review of hypothesis was conducted in an international symposium held by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists in 1928. Idea was largely abandoned by 1929 because of the lack of a reasonable driving mechanism for continental motion (Wegener believed that continents plowed their way through oceanic crust under tidal energy).

Evidence for Continental Drift

Paleomagnetism and Polar Wandering

        New techniques developed in the 1950s caused a resurgence of interest in continental drift:

Sea-Floor Exploration

Mapping of Ocean Floor

        Detailed mapping of the ocean floors began in the 1950s using echo-sounding techniques. Allowed topography of the
ocean floor to be determined. Studies revealed:

  1. Mid-ocean ridge and rift valley with associated volcanism.
  2. Deep ocean trenches with associated earthquake activity.
  3. Thinness of oceanic crust compared to continental crust.
  4. Lack of compressive deformation in oceanic crust.
  5. All dredged sediment samples were relatively young in age.
  6. Sediment thickness increases away from the oceanic ridge.
  7. Presence of guyots (submerged, flat-topped volcanoes) extending away from oceanic ridges.
Magnetic Anomalies (Reversals)

        Magnetic mapping of the ocean floors began in the early 1960s and is now complete for most of the ocean floor. Discovered that parallel, symmetric stripes of normal and reversed polarity rocks lie on either side of the oceanic ridges. Reversed polarity rocks can also be found on the continents, which show that reversals of the Earth's magnetic field (N becomes S and vice versa) have occurred many times in the geologic past. Reversals may be caused by sunspot activity at times of decreased magnetic field intensity. Historical pattern of the Earth's magnetism has been determined for the past several million years by combining the techniques of radiocarbon dating with paleomagnetism. Ocean floor magnetic surveys show youngest crust is located adjacent to the spreading ridges and that the age of the crust increases with distance away from the ridge.

Sea-Floor Spreading

Theory that the ocean floors are spreading apart and moving away from the oceanic ridges (propelled by thermal convection cells in the mantle) and that ocean crust is created at oceanic ridges and destroyed by subduction in deep ocean trenches. Proposed by Harry Hess in 1962 to explain the topographic features of the ocean floor and supported or explained by:
 

Plate Tectonics

        Combines the concepts of continental drift and sea-floor spreading together into a unified theory of the Earth's dynamics. Explains many apparently unrelated geologic events and features. Elements of theory are:

                                    1. Indian-Australian                             4. Antarctic
                                    2. Pacific                                              5. African
                                    3. American (N. and S)                        6. Eurasian
 
Plate Movement and Motion

        Plates move in different directions, change direction over time, and move at different rates. The Pacific and Cocos plates are the fastest moving and the Arabian and southern African plates are slowest. The rates and directions of lithospheric plate movement can be calculated in several ways:

  1. Date Ocean Sediments - Determine age of sediments at a point and divide by distance from ridge. Gives average rate of movement, but no direction. Least accurate method.
  2. Magnetic Reversals - Date magnetic reversals and divide by distances from ridge. Gives both average rate of movement and relative motion during the past. Wider stripes indicate faster plate motion.
  3. Satellite Laser Ranging Techniques - Laser beams from a station on one plate are bounced off a satellite and returned to a station on another plate. With divergent plate movement, the laser beam takes more time to reach the receiving station. Time difference is used to calculate the rate of movement and relative motion of the plates.
  4. Quasar Ranging Technique - Difference in arrival times of signal from a quasar to receiving stations on different plates. Calculated rates and relative directions of plate motion correlate well with those determined from magnetic reversals.
  5. Hot Spots - Hot spots provide a fixed reference point that allows the absolute (rather than relative) direction of motion to be determined.


Plate Tectonics Driving Mechanism

        The forces that drive the motion of plates are assumed to be associated with the Earth's internal heat and involve
flow of material in the asthenosphere. Various mechanisms have been proposed: